Explanation: Titles like Dr., Mr., Ms., or Prof. should be omitted when listing authors.

Reason: Including solicitation titles can seem unprofessional and unnecessary in an academic context. The focus should be on the research, not the titles of the authors.

Example:

• Incorrect: Dr. John Doe, Mr. Jane Smith
• Correct: John Doe, Jane Smith

Explanation: Avoid listing designations such as Professor, Associate Professor, etc.

Reason: Instead, simply list the author’s name and their affiliated institution. This keeps the focus on the research rather than the authors’ ranks.

Example:

• Incorrect: John Doe, Associate Professor, University of XYZ
• Correct: John Doe, University of XYZ

Explanation: Do not use official email addresses for corresponding authors.

Reason: Authors may change workplaces, making it difficult for future researchers to contact them. Use a personal or permanent email address instead.

Example:

• Incorrect: [email protected]
• Correct: [email protected]

Explanation: Avoid using acronyms or abbreviations in the title of the research paper.

Reason: Titles should be clear and understandable at first glance. Acronyms can be confusing and may not be universally recognized.

Example:

• Incorrect: “AI Techniques for Image Processing”
• Correct: “Artificial Intelligence Techniques for Image Processing”

Explanation: Do not include citations in the abstract.

Reason: The abstract is meant to be a concise summary of your research. Citations can clutter it and are better placed in the main body of the paper.

Example:

• Incorrect: “This study follows the methodology proposed by Smith (2020).”
• Correct: “This study employs a novel methodology.”

Explanation: Avoid presenting detailed results in the abstract.

Reason: The abstract should provide an overview. Detailed results should be discussed in the main sections of the paper. Instead, indicate whether results are better, moderate, or comparable.

Example:

• Incorrect: “The experiment showed a 12% increase in efficiency.”
• Correct: “The experiment showed a significant increase in efficiency.”

Explanation: Avoid using acronyms or abbreviations in the keywords section.

Reason: Keywords should be clear and universally understood to improve searchability.

Example:

• Incorrect: “AI, ML, NLP”
• Correct: “Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, Natural Language Processing”

Explanation: Do not include results in the methods section.

Reason: The methods section should strictly describe the procedures and methodologies used in the study.

Example:

• Incorrect: “The experiment yielded a 10% increase in efficiency using this method.”
• Correct: “This method involves three main steps: data collection, preprocessing, and analysis.”

Explanation: Avoid including recommendations or future directions that are beyond the scope of immediate implementation.

Reason: Conclusions and future directions should be realistic and directly related to your findings.

Example:

• Incorrect: “This method could potentially solve all issues in machine learning.”
• Correct: “This method shows promise for improving efficiency in specific machine learning tasks.”

Explanation: Avoid adding citations in the conclusion section.

Reason: The conclusion should summarize your findings without introducing new references or data.

Example:

• Incorrect: “As referenced by Smith (2020), the results indicate…”
• Correct: “The results indicate a significant improvement in efficiency.”

Explanation: Do not overuse self-citations unless they are part of a series of related works.

Reason: Excessive self-citations can be seen as self-promotional and can detract from the paper’s perceived objectivity.

Example:

• Incorrect: “Our previous works (Doe, 2018; Doe, 2019) provide further context.”
• Correct: “This study builds on previous research in the field.”

Explanation: Do not share or disclose confidential data without permission.

Reason: It’s crucial to respect privacy and confidentiality agreements. Always seek permission before sharing sensitive data.

Example:

• Incorrect: Including patient images without consent.
• Correct: Use anonymized data and seek necessary permissions.

Explanation: Do not acknowledge individuals who have not contributed to your research.

Reason: Acknowledgements should be reserved for those who have directly supported your work, either intellectually, financially, or technically.

Example:

• Incorrect: Acknowledging a friend who did not contribute to the research.
• Correct: Acknowledging colleagues who provided feedback or funding agencies.

Explanation: Avoid repeating the same information in multiple sections of the paper.

Reason: Redundancy can make the paper unnecessarily long and tedious to read.

Example:

• Incorrect: Repeating the methodology in both the introduction and methods section.
• Correct: Clearly delineate each section’s purpose and content.

Explanation: Avoid using informal language or colloquialisms.

Reason: Academic papers should maintain a formal tone to ensure clarity and professionalism.

Example:

• Incorrect: “This study was a game-changer in the field.”
• Correct: “This study represents a significant advancement in the field.”

Explanation: Do not include data that has not been thoroughly verified.

Reason: All data presented should be accurate and reliable to maintain the integrity of the research.

Example:

• Incorrect: Including speculative or unconfirmed results.
• Correct: Only presenting data that has been rigorously tested and confirmed.